Deprivation of Assets: Understanding the Rules and Implications for Care Home Fees

Deprivation of assets occurs when someone intentionally reduces their savings, property, or income in order to lower the amount they are assessed as needing to contribute toward care costs. If a local authority determines this has occurred, it can treat the transferred assets as if they are still owned by the individual.

Care funding assessments are means-tested, and the rules governing what counts as deliberate avoidance are more far-reaching than most families realise. This guide explains how the deprivation of assets rules work, what local authorities look for, and what the consequences are — including the legal routes available to councils under the Care Act 2014.

Before reading further, our care home funding guide covers the means test, capital thresholds, deferred payment agreements, and NHS funding options in full.

What Is Deliberate Deprivation of Assets?

Deliberate deprivation of assets is the intentional disposal, transfer, or conversion of capital — including savings, investments, or property — where the primary motivation was to reduce the amount assessed in a care funding means test.

The operative word throughout the Care Act 2014 guidance is "intentional." Local authorities are not assessing whether you have spent or given away money — they are assessing why you did it and, critically, whether care needs were reasonably foreseeable at the time.

This is a meaningful distinction. A gift made a decade ago when someone was in good health and had no reason to anticipate care needs is treated very differently from a transfer made weeks before a care needs assessment.

What Do Local Authorities Look for When Investigating?

When assessing potential deprivation, a local authority examines the timing of the transaction, the individual's health at the time, the amount involved, and whether the primary purpose could reasonably have been to avoid care costs.

The factors a council will examine include:

Timing: How close was the transaction to when care needs arose or were foreseeable?
Health: Was the person already experiencing the health decline that led to their care needs?
Foreseeability: Could a reasonable person in that situation have anticipated needing care?
Amount: Was the sum proportionate to normal spending or gift-giving patterns, or was it unusually large?
Motive: Is there a credible explanation for the transaction that is unrelated to care funding?
Pattern: Does this represent a single large transfer or part of a consistent pattern of behaviour?

There is no statutory time limit on how far back a local authority can investigate. In practice, councils focus on transactions made when care needs were foreseeable, and the burden of proof increases the further back a transfer took place.

"The question we always encourage families to ask — before making any significant financial decision — is whether they could be asked to explain it to a council officer in three years' time. If the honest answer is that the primary reason was care funding, that is exactly what a local authority will conclude." — Ashberry Healthcare

What Happens If a Local Authority Finds Deliberate Deprivation?

If deliberate deprivation is found, the local authority treats the transferred assets as "notional capital" — meaning they are included in the means test as though the person still owns them, even though they do not.

Notional capital is the formal mechanism by which this works. Under the Care Act 2014, a local authority that concludes assets were deliberately deprived calculates the individual's care contribution based on the assets they would have held, not those they currently hold. The person is therefore charged as a self-funder — or at a higher rate — despite no longer owning those assets.

The consequences can extend beyond the individual. Under section 70 of the Care Act 2014, local authorities have specific powers to pursue asset recovery directly from a third party who received assets as a result of deliberate deprivation. This applies where:

The person entered residential care as a local authority-funded resident within six months of the transfer, or
The transfer took place after the person was already a local authority-funded resident.

In those circumstances, the council can seek to recover from the recipient the value of the assets transferred, up to the amount of unpaid care fees. This is often unknown to families until an investigation is already underway.

What Does Not Count as Deprivation of Assets?

Not every financial transaction is scrutinised. Local authorities recognise that people manage their money for many legitimate reasons, and actions taken when care needs were not foreseeable are unlikely to be treated as deliberate deprivation.

Transactions that are generally not considered deliberate deprivation include:

Regular gifts at normal levels — birthday, Christmas, and wedding gifts consistent with established patterns of giving
Charitable donations that reflect a documented history of charitable behaviour
Paying off legitimate debts, including mortgages
Home improvements, renovations, or maintenance carried out when in good health
Normal day-to-day living expenses and reasonable lifestyle spending
Financial decisions made when care needs were genuinely not foreseeable

The pattern of behaviour matters significantly. A grandparent who has given each grandchild £200 at Christmas for fifteen years continuing that tradition will attract no scrutiny. The same grandparent suddenly giving £40,000 to each grandchild immediately after a dementia diagnosis is a very different situation.

The Common Misconception About Property Transfers

Transferring ownership of your home to a family member does not protect it from a care funding assessment if the local authority concludes the transfer was motivated by avoiding care costs. You may be assessed as though you still own a property you no longer control.

This is one of the most frequently encountered — and most damaging — misunderstandings in care funding. Many families believe that signing a property over to a son or daughter removes it from the means test. In cases where the transfer is found to constitute deliberate deprivation, it does not.

The outcome can be severe: the local authority assesses the individual as though they own the property's full value, while the individual has in fact lost all legal control over it. They cannot sell it, cannot use equity release to fund care, and cannot enter into a Deferred Payment Agreement using it as security — yet they are still charged as though it belongs to them.

If you are concerned about whether a property still occupied by a family member should be included in an assessment, our articles on protecting your home and assets as a spouse and whether your daughter can continue to live in your house if you go into care explain the property disregard rules in detail.

The "7-Year Rule": What It Does and Does Not Mean for Care Funding

There is no equivalent of the Inheritance Tax "7-year rule" in care funding law. A local authority can in principle look back indefinitely at asset transfers, with no automatic safe harbour period.

The 7-year rule is a concept from Inheritance Tax law relating to potentially exempt transfers. It has no direct application to care funding means-testing. The two regimes are entirely separate, and treating one as a proxy for the other is a common and costly mistake.

What is true is that the further back a transfer took place, and the healthier the person was at the time, the harder it becomes for a local authority to demonstrate that care needs were foreseeable at the point of transfer. That is a question of evidence, not a legal time limit.

Our dedicated article on the 7-year rule for care home fees explains the distinction between Inheritance Tax planning and care funding rules in full.

How the Financial Assessment Works

The care home means test assesses your total capital — savings, investments, and property — against government-set thresholds to determine how much you are expected to contribute toward care fees.

The current thresholds in England for 2026 are:

Above £23,250: You pay the full cost of care as a self-funder.
Between £14,250 and £23,250: You contribute from income, plus a tariff income charge of £1 per week for every £250 of capital above the lower limit.
Below £14,250: Only your income is considered; no contribution is required from capital.

These thresholds have remained unchanged since 2010 in real terms. The £86,000 lifetime cap on personal care costs — which would have introduced significantly more generous means-testing thresholds — was formally scrapped by the Labour Government in July 2024 and will not be introduced.

You retain a Personal Expenses Allowance in all cases — rising to £31.80 per week from April 2026 — which cannot be taken from you regardless of your capital or income level.

For a full explanation of how the means test operates, see our article on understanding care home fees and your finances.

Legitimate Ways to Plan Ahead for Care Costs

Planning for care costs is entirely legitimate. The relevant distinction is between financial decisions made for genuine personal or family reasons and those made primarily to reduce a care funding liability.

There are lawful approaches to managing care costs that do not constitute deprivation of assets:

Deferred Payment Agreements: Where a local authority pays care fees on your behalf and recovers the cost from your property later, typically on sale. This is a formal agreement that protects both parties. See our guide to deferred payment agreements for care home fees.
Immediate needs annuities: A care fees annuity purchased from a regulated insurer guarantees a fixed income toward care costs for life, in exchange for a lump sum. It removes longevity risk and the income is disregarded in certain assessments.
NHS Continuing Healthcare: If your primary need is a health need rather than a social care need, full NHS funding may be available with no means test. Our guide to NHS Continuing Healthcare explains the eligibility criteria.
Benefits entitlements: Self-funders often qualify for Attendance Allowance and other non-means-tested benefits regardless of capital level. Our article on benefits available to self-funders covers each entitlement.
Early financial and legal planning: Establishing a Lasting Power of Attorney for property and financial affairs, and consulting a specialist solicitor and a Society of Later Life Advisers (SOLLA)-accredited financial adviser, before care is needed gives significantly more options than planning after the fact. See our guide to power of attorney and care home fees.

The guiding principle is documentation and timing. Financial decisions made for genuine reasons, supported by contemporary evidence, are in a fundamentally stronger position than those constructed after the fact.

"The families who navigate care funding most successfully are almost always those who took independent advice before making significant financial decisions — not after. A specialist care funding adviser will help identify what is legitimate, what carries risk, and what is off the table entirely. The cost of that advice is trivial compared to the consequences of getting it wrong." — Ashberry Healthcare

Can You Challenge a Deprivation of Assets Decision?

Yes. If you believe a local authority has incorrectly concluded that deliberate deprivation has occurred, you can challenge the decision through the authority's formal complaints procedure and, if unresolved, escalate to the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman.

The steps typically involved are:

Submit a written challenge to the local authority's care funding team, setting out clearly why you believe the decision is incorrect and providing supporting documentation — bank statements, correspondence, legal documents — that establishes the genuine purpose of the transaction.
Request an internal review if the initial response is unsatisfactory.
Escalate to the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman if the internal process is exhausted without resolution.

Independent legal representation from a solicitor specialising in social care law significantly strengthens a challenge. The burden of proof rests with the local authority to demonstrate that the primary motivation was to avoid care costs — it is not automatically for the individual to disprove it.

Frequently Asked Questions

What if I have already given assets away and now need care?Contact a solicitor specialising in social care law as soon as possible. They can assess the likely local authority view of the transaction, help you document the legitimate reasons behind it, and represent you if an investigation begins. Acting early gives you significantly more options than waiting for the council to raise it first.

Can I make gifts to family members?Yes. You are legally entitled to be generous with your own money. The question the local authority will ask is whether the gift was proportionate to your normal patterns of giving and whether care needs were foreseeable at the time. Substantial gifts made when care needs are already apparent will attract scrutiny; consistent, modest giving over many years is very unlikely to.

Does putting assets in a trust protect them?Possibly, in limited circumstances, but trust structures established primarily to avoid care costs can themselves be treated as deliberate deprivation. The key factor is whether you retain any benefit or control. Independent legal advice from a solicitor specialising in later-life planning is essential before establishing any trust for this purpose.

Can a council pursue someone who received assets from me?Yes, in specific circumstances. Under section 70 of the Care Act 2014, local authorities can pursue third-party recipients of transferred assets where the transfer occurred within six months of the person moving into council-funded care, or after they were already in council-funded care. The council can seek recovery of up to the value of the unpaid care fees.

What if I spent my savings rather than giving them away?You are entitled to spend your money on your own life. However, where spending is sudden, unusually large, and occurs immediately before a care assessment, a local authority may examine whether it was genuinely for personal benefit or designed to reduce assessable capital. Ordinary lifestyle spending is not scrutinised; a rapid reduction in savings immediately before care needs arise may be.

Getting the Right Advice

Deprivation of assets is one of the most legally complex areas of care funding, and the consequences of misunderstanding the rules — or acting on the assumption that the 7-year rule applies — can be significant and long-lasting.

If you or your family are navigating care funding decisions, the right step is always to take independent advice early, from professionals who specialise in this area. The Society of Later Life Advisers (SOLLA) maintains an accreditation scheme for financial advisers specialising in care funding, and Law Society-registered solicitors with a specialism in Court of Protection and later-life planning can advise on the legal dimensions.

Our care home funding guide brings together the full picture across means testing, NHS funding, and self-funding options. If you would like to discuss care options at one of our homes, our team is happy to help you understand what support is available and point you toward the right specialist advice.

Get in touch with the Ashberry team.

This article reflects the Care Act 2014 statutory guidance and GOV.UK Social Care Charging circular for 2026 to 2027, confirmed February 2026. Capital limits and Personal Expenses Allowance figures are subject to annual government review. This article does not constitute legal or financial advice. Independent specialist advice is recommended before making any significant financial decision in connection with care funding.

‍